Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Dec 2010

Use of Orthogonal Arrays for Efficient Evaluation of Geometric Designs for Reducing Vibration of a Non-Pneumatic Wheel during High-Speed Rolling

,
,
,
,
,
, and
Page Range: 246 – 275
DOI: 10.2346/1.3519640
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

During high speed rolling of a nonpneumatic wheel, vibration may be produced by the interaction of collapsible spokes with a shear deformable ring as they enter the contact region, buckle, and then snap back into a state of tension. In the present work, a systematic study of the effects of six key geometric design parameters is presented using Orthogonal Arrays. Orthogonal Arrays are part of a design process method developed by Taguchi which provides an efficient way to determine optimal combinations of design variables. In the present work, a two-dimensional planar finite element model with geometric nonlinearity and explicit time-stepping is used to simulate rolling of the nonpneumatic wheel. Vibration characteristics are measured from the FFT frequency spectrum of the time signals of perpendicular distance of marker nodes from the virtual plane of the spoke, and ground reaction forces. Both maximum peak amplitudes and RMS measures are considered. Two complementary Orthogonal Arrays are evaluated. The first is the L8 orthogonal array which considers the six geometric design variables evaluated at lower and higher limiting values for a total of eight experiments defined by statistically efficient variable combinations. Based on the results from the L8 orthogonal array, a second L9 orthogonal array experiment evaluates the nonlinear effects in the four parameters of greatest interest, (a) spoke length, (b) spoke curvature, (c) spoke thickness, and (d) shear beam thickness. The L9 array consists of nine experiments with efficient combinations of low, intermediate, and high value levels. Results from use of the Orthogonal Array experiments were used to find combinations of parameters which significantly reduce peak and RMS amplitudes, and suggest that spoke length has the greatest effect on vibration amplitudes.

Copyright: The Tire Society
FIG. 1
FIG. 1

Nonpneumatic wheel mounted on a hub.


FIG. 2
FIG. 2

Deformed geometry at end of rolling step (Reference Geometry).


FIG. 3
FIG. 3

Stress-strain relation for Marlow hyperelastic material property.


FIG. 4
FIG. 4

Diagram of geometric variables in study.


FIG. 5
FIG. 5

Marker nodes on undeformed and deformed spoke in contact region. Line between top and bottom of spoke defining virtual plane. Spoke vibration measured from perpendicular distance from marker nodes to virtual plane.


FIG. 6
FIG. 6

Perpendicular spoke distance of Experiment 7 showing relatively large vibration amplitude during steady rolling.


FIG. 7
FIG. 7

Perpendicular spoke distance of Experiment 6 showing relatively small vibration amplitude during steady rolling.


FIG. 8
FIG. 8

FFT Spectrum with Hamming Window for spoke vibration Experiment 7 (Top) Upper Quarter Node, (Bottom) Middle Node.


FIG. 9
FIG. 9

FFT spectrum with Hamming Window for spoke vibration Experiment 6 (Top) Upper Quarter Node, (Bottom) Middle Node.


FIG. 10
FIG. 10

Spokes in tension during Rolling Step.


FIG. 11
FIG. 11

Vibration of spokes while in tension at approximately 270 Hz for Experiment 7.


FIG. 12
FIG. 12

Vibration of spokes while in tension at approximately 570 Hz for Experiment 7.


FIG. 13
FIG. 13

Interaction of Spoke Length and Spoke Thickness. RMS Amplitude for Spoke Vibration.


FIG. 14
FIG. 14

Ground Reaction Force for Experiment 6, All Steps.


FIG. 15
FIG. 15

FFT Spectrum for Ground Interaction, Experiment 6.


FIG. 16
FIG. 16

FFT Spectrum for Ground Interaction, Experiment 7.


FIG. 17
FIG. 17

Screen shot showing ground interaction, 0.2632 s.


FIG. 18
FIG. 18

Screen shot showing ground interaction, 0.2638 s.


FIG. 19
FIG. 19

Screen shot showing ground interaction, 0.2644 s.


FIG. 20
FIG. 20

Recommended variable levels for reduction in spoke vibration amplitude from L8 array experiments.


  • Download PDF