Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 29 Apr 2019

Understanding Tire Dynamic Characteristics for Vehicle Dynamics Ride Using Simulation Methods

,
, and
Page Range: 188 – 206
DOI: 10.2346/tire.19.180196
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

The dynamic characteristics of a tire are studied by simulating its rolling over a cleat and observing the effect on in-plane rigid belt vibration modes. Three modeling approaches are used to understand various tire design parameters affecting the tire dynamics relevant for vehicle ride performance. First, a simplified three-degree-of-freedom rigid ring model is used for fundamental understanding of these modes. Next, a detailed finite element model accounting for component compliances is used for studying the sensitivity of the modes to most common design parameter variations employed in tire development. Finally, to study these tire design changes in operation, vehicle simulations using CarSim and FTire models are performed. FTire model parameters corresponding to tire design parameters are adjusted accordingly. Observations are reported of the effects of tire design parameters on cleat responses and on correlation of results between finite element and FTire models.

FIG 1. —
FIG 1. —

Rigid modes of vibration of tire under unloaded and loaded condition [4].


FIG 2. —
FIG 2. —

Time domain force response of a tire rolling over a cleat at pinned axle condition, at Vx = 30 kph and 90 kph.


FIG 3. —
FIG 3. —

Frequency domain force response of tire rolling over at cleat at pinned axle condition (left, longitudinal; right, vertical).


FIG 4. —
FIG 4. —

3 DOF rigid ring model representing a loaded tire on a pinned axle/spindle.


FIG 5. —
FIG 5. —

Time response of the rigid ring model; bottom is zooming into approximately two cycles of a larger-amplitude, lower-frequency in-phase mode.


FIG 6. —
FIG 6. —

Frequency response (magnitude and phase angle) of rigid ring model.


FIG 7. —
FIG 7. —

Sensitivity of in-phase and anti-phase modes.


FIG 8. —
FIG 8. —

Finite element model of a tire.


FIG 9. —
FIG 9. —

In-phase, anti-phase, and vertical modes of a finite element tire model.


FIG 10. —
FIG 10. —

Sensitivity of in-phase mode to tire component stiffness and inertia.


FIG 11. —
FIG 11. —

Sensitivity of anti-phase mode to tire component stiffness and inertia.


FIG 12. —
FIG 12. —

Sensitivity of vertical mode to tire components stiffness and inertia.


FIG 13. —
FIG 13. —

Multibody based lumped-mass approach used to model belt, carcass, and bead [6,8].


FIG 14. —
FIG 14. —

Sensitivity to tread stiffness: frequency response at the front axle for vehicle rolling over a cleat (1 cm × 1 cm) at Vx = 30 kph (left) and 100 kph (right).


FIG 15. —
FIG 15. —

Sensitivity to tread damping: frequency response at the front axle for vehicle rolling over a cleat (1 cm × 1 cm) at Vx = 100 kph.


FIG 16. —
FIG 16. —

Sensitivity to longitudinal stiffness: frequency response at the front axle for vehicle rolling over a cleat (1 cm × 1 cm) at Vx = 30 kph (left) and 100 kph (right).


FIG 17. —
FIG 17. —

Sensitivity to vertical stiffness: frequency response at the front axle for vehicle rolling over a cleat (1 cm × 1 cm) at Vx = 30 kph (left) and 100 kph (right).


FIG 18. —
FIG 18. —

Sensitivity to percentage of belt mass: frequency response at the front axle for vehicle rolling over a cleat (1 cm × 1 cm) at Vx = 30 kph (left) and 100 kph (right).


Contributor Notes

Hankook Tire–America Technical Center, 3535 Forest Lake Drive, Uniontown, Ohio 44685, USA
Corresponding author. Email: siramdasu@hankook-atc.com
  • Download PDF