Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 04 Jun 2021

An Empirical Tire-Wear Model for Heavy-Goods Vehicles

,
, and
Page Range: 211 – 229
DOI: 10.2346/tire.21.20003
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

Tire selection has an important impact on the operational costs of heavy-goods vehicles (HGVs). HGV tires are designed on a tradeoff between wear resistance, rolling resistance, and adhesion (skid resistance). High wear resistance tires (high mileage) are replaced less often but use more fuel during operation, and vice versa for low rolling resistance tires. Presently, finding the optimal tire to minimize replacement costs and fuel consumption (greenhouse gas emissions) is challenging due to the difficulty in predicting tire wear for a given operation, since its rate varies with different vehicle configurations (e.g., load, vehicle length, number of axles, type of axle, etc.) and road types (e.g., motorways/highways, minor roads, urban roads, etc.).

This article presents a novel empirical tire-wear model that can be used to predict the wear for multi-axle vehicles based on route data and a vehicle model. The first part of the article presents the analytical and experimental development of the model. The second part presents the experimental validation of the model based on 10 months of in-service data totaling 37,000 km of operation. The model predicts tire tread depth within 8% (average error of 2%).

FIG. 1 —
FIG. 1 —

Simplified single-track model of three-axle rigid truck, showing large slip angles on rear axles caused by geometry in a steady-state turn.


FIG. 2 —
FIG. 2 —

Tire-wear experimental trailer setup.


FIG. 3 —
FIG. 3 —

Modified vacuum cleaner to collect rubber.


FIG. 4 —
FIG. 4 —

Measured tire wear as a function of the slip angle for three different normal loads, K = 0.04 g/(m2·°) [132 g/(m2 rad)].


FIG. 5 —
FIG. 5 —

Schematic of the tire-wear prediction process.


FIG. 6 —
FIG. 6 —

Tractor–semitrailer dynamic model, slip angles are positioned for illustrative purposes only.


FIG. 7 —
FIG. 7 —

GPS coordinates smoothing process: (a) using the Snap to Roads Google API to remove GPS drops and drifts, (b) issues with Snap to roads Google API such as mini roundabouts and sharp turns when changing roads, (c) smoothing process (moving average), (d) tuning the moving-average length to obtain realistic slip angles.


FIG. 8 —
FIG. 8 —

Measured and predicted tire tread depth for each trailer tire. The measurements were taken approximately every month. The initial tire tread depth is 17 mm.


FIG. 9 —
FIG. 9 —

Typical lateral and longitudinal slip angle distributions (probability density functions) from the simulations, the absolute slip angle values are represented.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author. Department of Operations and Decision Systems, Université Laval, 2325 rue de la Terrasse, Québec City, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada. Email: Julien.lepine@fsa.ulaval.ca
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington St., Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom. Email: Xnhn2@cam.ac.uk
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington St., Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom. Email: Dc29@cam.ac.uk
  • Download PDF