Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 16 Jul 2021

Numerical Study on the Effect of 185/65R14 Tire Rim Width on Dynamic Performance of a B Class Vehicle Model

and
Page Range: 249 – 269
DOI: 10.2346/tire.21.20009
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

In this study, the effect of a passenger car radial tire rim width on its force and moment characteristics (behavior) and subsequently on a vehicle dynamic performance is investigated. The study on the sensitivity of tire behavior to changing its rim width was carried out using the finite element method with the help of Abaqus. For this purpose, the finite element models of a 185/65R14 tire with two rim widths of 5.5″ and 6″ were created and compared in terms of steady-state longitudinal, steady-state lateral, transient longitudinal, and transient lateral behavior, by simulation of stiffness measuring and slip tests. To investigate the effect of rim width on vehicle dynamic performance, several road tests were simulated using a full vehicle dynamic model from CarSim. In each test, at least one of the parameters associated with the discussion of vehicle dynamic performance evaluation including brake distance, understeer gradient, vehicle slip angle, lateral deviation, and roll angle is measured. The vehicle model used is one of the B class instant vehicle models from CarSim, for which this tire size is appropriate. For all subsystems except tires, the same default values were used. For tires, the Pacejka 5.2 tire model is used. Numerical values of the coefficients of this tire model are calculated by fitting the curves of the tire forces and moments obtained from the finite element simulation of required tire tests. The results of the road test simulations have shown that the vehicle with the narrower rim has the better braking ability, but its other behavioral aspects are weaker.

Keywords: rim width; tire behavior; finite element tire model; road tests; Pacejka 5.2 tire model
FIG. 1 —
FIG. 1 —

Showing rubber components and bead components in the tire cross-section.

FIG. 2 —
FIG. 2 —

Meshed cross-section of the 185/65R14 tire with 5.5″ and 6″ rim widths.

FIG. 3 —
FIG. 3 —

Friction coefficient of tread–road surface versus sliding velocity and contact pressure.

FIG. 4 —
FIG. 4 —

Three-dimensional finite element tire model in ISO Cartesian coordinate system.

FIG. 5 —
FIG. 5 —

Comparison of the simulating results obtained from finite element simulation with CarSim data for a steady-state pure longitudinal slip test.

FIG. 6 —
FIG. 6 —

Comparison of the simulating results obtained from finite element simulation with CarSim data for a steady-state pure lateral slip test.

FIG. 7 —
FIG. 7 —

Effect of rim width on the parameters related to the steady-state longitudinal behavior.

FIG. 8 —
FIG. 8 —

Effect of rim width on the parameters related to the steady-state lateral behavior.

FIG. 9 —
FIG. 9 —

Effect of rim width on tire stiffness in longitudinal and lateral directions.

FIG. 10 —
FIG. 10 —

Vehicles view at the end of “braking in the straight path” test.

FIG. 11 —
FIG. 11 —

Front wheel steering angle versus vehicle lateral acceleration in, “understeer gradient” maneuver.

FIG. 12 —
FIG. 12 —

Vehicle roll angle versus vehicle lateral acceleration, in “understeer gradient” maneuver.

FIG. 13 —
FIG. 13 —

Vehicle slip angle versus vehicle lateral acceleration in “double-lane-changing” maneuver.

FIG. 14 —
FIG. 14 —

Cars' view in the 19th moment of the “traveling on a straight road with cross-slope” test.

FIG. 15 —
FIG. 15 —

Curves of the traveled path by the vehicle for each of two mentioned tire structures.

Contributor Notes

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. Email: sh.vaseli@me.iut.ac.ir
2 Corresponding author. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. Email: mesf1964@cc.iut.ac.ir
  • Download PDF