Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 09 Jun 2025

A Study on the Mid-frequency Tire-Sourced Cabin Noise in Electric Vehicles

Page Range: 124 – 133
DOI: 10.2346/TST-22-018
Save
Download PDF

ABSTRACT

This study investigates and provides a framework for addressing a reported tire- sourced cabin noise in the mid-frequency range of 300–500 Hz for an electric vehicle (EV). Noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) of EVs present new challenges compared with internal combustion engine vehicles because of significant design changes between the two vehicle types. In turn, the tire–road interaction noise becomes a more significant source of cabin noise in EVs. In this regard, some prominent EV manufacturers recently reported relatively high measured cabin noise, particularly in the mid-frequency range of 300–500 Hz. Identifying the root cause(s) of noise in that range is a challenging task, as both tire structure–borne and airborne sources are contributors in that frequency range of elevated noise.

The current work presents the results of an experimental modal analysis to provide insight into some potential sources of the reported noise for an all-season tire/wheel assembly designed for an EV. The subsequent parametric simulations, conducted via the tire–vehicle finite element model, evaluate some of the mitigation solutions for the reported noise.

FIG. 1
FIG. 1

(a) and (b) Third-octave cabin SPL at the DOE (vehicle speeds of 65 mph and 35 mph, respectively). (c) Narrowband cabin SPL at the DOE overlaid with the left front (LF) knuckle vibration (vehicle speed: 65 mph).


FIG. 2
FIG. 2

Research framework for root cause analysis of an undesired mid-frequency noise. (a) EMA of a fixed-spindle loaded tire/wheel assembly: measurement nodes on the tire/wheel and the impact locations on the wheel (i.e., Fx, Fy, and Fz). (b) Tire FE model and (c) tire/vehicle FE model capable of estimating spindle responses as well as ERP (a sound metric for the vehicle’s cabin).


FIG. 3
FIG. 3

Some of the tire/wheel mode shapes in the mid-frequency 300–500 Hz.


FIG. 4
FIG. 4

Spindle response (forces) FRFs and the identified mode shapes with natural frequencies matching the spindle response FRF peaks.


FIG. 5
FIG. 5

Predicted cabin ERPs (vehicle speed: 65 mph) when utilizing wheels of different stiffness.


FIG. 6
FIG. 6

Predicted cabin ERP (vehicle speed: 50 mph) for different applied cap reinforcement stiffness.


Contributor Notes

Corresponding author. Email: pejman.razi@gmail.com
  • Download PDF